Console Five-Destination Build-Out — Completion Report (2026-08-29)

Status of this document: terminal record of the console destination arc, written under the owner's 2026-08-29 approved:merge / approved:commit / "document all" directive. Every claim below is measured in-session (commands named), not inherited.

1. What the arc delivered

The 2026-08-28 console consolidation (PR #868, merged c43c4b47) reorganized ~151 route files and six competing home pages onto five destinations — decisions, evidence, loop, governance, estate — with scaffold stubs. On 2026-08-29 the four stub destinations gained real page content, each via its own reviewed PR, all merged the same day:

(decisions shipped with real content — the decisions inbox — inside #868 itself.) The Governance destination (#874) carries four sub-surfaces: status, audit, claims, onboarding, plus useGovernanceReads.ts read hooks against registry-status and tenant-economics/costs — 9 files, +879 lines, all additive, no flags, no service code.

2. Deployed and serving

Merging to main fires Deploy Command Center UI on miz-oki-command-center-ui/** paths:

• Run 33250550830 (11:37Z, after the #876/#874/#873 trio) — SUCCESS → revision miz-oki-command-center-ui-00567-gqs (Ready 12:01:44Z).
• Run 33256476483 (14:01Z, after #875 Estate) — SUCCESS → revision miz-oki-command-center-ui-00568-fd5, measured latestReady, Ready=True at report time (gcloud run services describe).

So the serving revision carries all five destinations with real content. Claim level: deployed through each workflow's own gate steps; live probing of the destination routes was not separately performed in this session (the UI is behind auth) — the workflow verify steps are the deploy-time evidence.

3. The token adjudication (why nothing was re-merged today)

The owner typed approved:merge + approved:commit while the shared working tree sat on feat/console-governance-destination (2 commits, 74c1e7c1 + 4d4b393f, authored 2026-08-28 ~21:44–21:52Z). Measured state:

• PR #874's head was this same branch, squash-merged 11:36Z — before the tokens arrived.
• The three-dot diff (origin/main...HEAD) showed +879 lines "unmerged" — the squash-merge illusion (.claude/memory precedent: "Ahead+CONFLICT usually means squash-merged"; here Ahead+CLEAN). The decisive test was per-file two-dot content comparison: all 9 files byte-identical to main (git diff --quiet origin/main HEAD -- <file> per file, 9/9 IDENTICAL).
• Same test on feat/console-evidence-destination (1 ahead by ancestry): every file it ever changed (three-dot name list, two-dot content check) identical to main.

Conclusion recorded: both tokens were already satisfied — the merge by PR #874, the commit by the branch's own landed commits. Re-merging a squash-merged branch adds nothing and risks the false-conflict trap, so it was deliberately not done. Both fully-landed branches were then retired (git push origin --delete, verified: git ls-remote origin 'refs/heads/feat/console-*' now empty); the shared working tree was returned to main. (feat/loop-destination-pages and feat/console-estate-destination had already been auto-deleted at merge.)

4. Related open items, unchanged by this arc

• Issue #869 (badge warn/error status tokens) — stays OPEN by the 2026-08-28 recorded decision: the vendored _ds bundle is a generated Claude Design export and will not be hand-patched; closure = the next design-system export carries semantic --status-* tokens.
• Issue #784 — items 2–4 remain owner-held (GitHub-admin / GCP capabilities); item 1 verified satisfied 2026-08-28 (comment on the issue carries the evidence).
• Frontend Guard reds visible on feat/console-estate-destination at 11:46Z were pre-merge iterations of #875; its merged state went green and deployed (run 33256476483).

5. Rollback

UI-only arc. Standard Cloud Run traffic rollback: gcloud run services update-traffic miz-oki-command-center-ui --to-revisions=miz-oki-command-center-ui-00567-gqs=100 steps back the Estate landing; 00566-* and earlier predate the destination content. No schema, flag, or service-code component exists in this arc, so no other rollback leg is required.